In a market replace despatched to Rigzone late Friday, Rystad Power highlighted that the U.S. Supreme Courtroom dominated that the Worldwide Emergency Financial Powers Act (IEEPA) doesn’t grant the U.S. president the authority to impose tariffs.
Rystad outlined that this “outlaw[s]… all tariffs imposed below IEEPA since February 2025, the one largest part of the [Trump] administration’s tariff structure”.
Rystad Chief Economist Claudio Galimberti warned within the replace, nevertheless, that, “whereas the Supreme Courtroom’s ruling invalidates a big share of present tariffs and weakens the flexibility to focus on particular person international locations, it doesn’t dismantle the broader tariff framework”.
“U.S. buying and selling companions are usually not off the hook because the Trump administration fights again with a ten p.c world tariff, with the flexibility to extend it to fifteen p.c,” he added.
“If this higher restrict is reached with out earlier IEEPA exemptions, the typical tariff price may climb even greater than below the construction that was simply struck down by the Supreme Courtroom,” Galimberti stated.
“For EU nations and buying and selling companions reminiscent of India and Canada, single, punitive charges are now not an possibility for the Trump administration. The stick is now the identical measurement for everybody, and it’s a little smaller,” he famous.
Galimberti went on to state that renegotiation is again on the desk, however added that “tariffs affecting imported metal merchandise, together with line pipe used for drilling oil and fuel, stay in place”.
“The present results of the Supreme Courtroom’s ruling just isn’t a reversal of protectionism, however a narrower, extra legally constrained U.S. tariff regime,” he stated.
Rystad acknowledged within the replace that the precise affect on commerce stays unsure because the administration pivots to a brand new tariff regime below Part 122.
“Evaluation from the Yale Funds Lab (YBL) means that if the brand new tariff have been enforced on the higher restrict of 15 p.c with out the earlier IEEPA exemptions, the typical efficient tariff price would climb to 24.1 p.c – considerably greater than the 16.9 p.c price below the now-invalidated IEEPA construction,” Rystad added.
In an announcement despatched to Rigzone on Monday morning, Aaron Hill Chief Market Analyst at FP Markets, famous that the Brent oil worth was holding round $71-72 per barrel and that WTI was close to $66-67 per barrel, “with crude trapped between rising geopolitical premiums and softening demand alerts”.
“Commerce uncertainty from the White Home’s proposed Part 122 tariffs is clouding world progress expectations, whereas Iran associated tensions and Center East provide dangers are preserving a flooring below costs – significantly for Brent, which stays extra delicate to worldwide disruption narratives,” he added.
“On the similar time, sticky inflation, slowing earnings progress, and cautious customers within the U.S. mood the upside by questioning ahead demand power,” he continued.
“With central financial institution rhetoric, greenback path, and OPEC/IEA steering forward, oil is poised for volatility, not pattern conviction,” Hill warned.
In a remark posted on his Fact Social web page on February 21, U.S. President Donald Trump referred to as the U.S. Supreme Courtroom tariff resolution “anti-American” and acknowledged that, “through the subsequent brief variety of months, the Trump Administration will decide and difficulty the brand new and legally permissible Tariffs”, which he stated “will proceed our terribly profitable technique of Making America Nice Once more”.
Brent gained 5.9 p.c final week, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (SEB) Chief Commodities Analyst Bjarne Schieldrop identified in a SEB report despatched to Rigzone immediately.
“Brent crude traded in a variety of $66.82-72.34 per barrel final week. It gained 5.9 p.c and closed the week at a excessive word of $71.76 per barrel in worry that hostilities would get away over the weekend,” Schieldrop stated within the report.
“They didn’t and Brent is down 0.5 p.c this morning at $71.3 per barrel because of this,” he added.
To contact the creator, e-mail andreas.exarheas@rigzone.com

